Already a member?

Access Your Courses
home
about
work with me
services
Drerinley logo
Drerinley logo
contact
blog
learn with me
book now

Beyond BMI: Is It Actually a Good Measure of Health?

By Dr. Erin Ley, ND MSCP7/14/2026
person standing on white digital bathroom scale

If you've ever left a doctor's appointment feeling reduced to a single number, you're not alone. BMI — body mass index — has been the default measure of body health for decades. It shows up on lab requisitions, insurance forms, and clinical guidelines worldwide. But is BMI actually a good measure of health? The short answer: not on its own.

Let's talk about what BMI is, why it falls short, and which measurements give you a more accurate and useful picture of what's happening in your body.

What Is BMI and Where Did It Come From?

BMI is calculated by dividing your weight by the square of your height. Simple enough. But it was originally developed in the 1800s by a mathematician studying population averages — not a clinician, and not a tool designed to assess individual health. Nearly 150 years later, it got rebranded and adopted as the global standard for classifying body weight.

The problem? It was never built to assess one person's health. It can't tell the difference between muscle and fat. It doesn't account for where fat is stored in your body — which, as it turns out, matters quite a bit. And it applies the same cut-offs to people of wildly different ages, body builds, and ethnic backgrounds, even though the research shows those groups respond very differently at the same BMI.

Two people can have the exact same BMI and have very different health profiles.

Why BMI Is Not an Accurate Measure of Health

It Can't Distinguish Muscle from Fat

BMI measures mass — full stop. A highly muscular person may be classified as "overweight" or "obese" by BMI standards, while someone with very little muscle and higher body fat may fall into the "normal" range. This is sometimes called normal-weight obesity, and it's more common than people realize.

This shows up regularly in clinical practice. Someone comes in frustrated — they've been working hard, lifting consistently, eating well, and the scale has barely moved. But their body composition has shifted significantly. They've gained muscle and lost fat. Their energy is better, their bloodwork has improved, and their clothes fit differently. By every meaningful measure, their health has improved. BMI? Unchanged. The number on the scale? Nearly identical. This is exactly why BMI alone can't be the metric we're tracking.

It Ignores Where Fat Is Stored in Your Body

Not all fat is created equal. Fat stored around the abdomen — particularly the deep, visceral fat surrounding internal organs — is metabolically more active and more strongly linked to cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome than fat stored elsewhere. BMI gives you no information about this.

Tools like InBody scans and DXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) can measure visceral adiposity directly, giving you and your provider a specific, trackable metric over time. That's a very different conversation from "your BMI is X."

Standard Cut-Offs Don't Apply Equally to Everyone

Research consistently shows that people of South Asian, East Asian, and other non-White backgrounds carry greater health risk at lower BMI values than standard cut-offs suggest. For South Asian individuals specifically, clinically meaningful risk can emerge at a BMI well below what most guidelines currently use as a threshold. Standard cut-offs were largely developed using data from White European populations, and applying them universally misses people who need support.

Better Alternatives to BMI for Tracking Health

No single measurement tells the whole story. But here are the tools that, in practice, tend to paint the most useful picture:

Clinical measurements worth tracking:

  • Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio — strong indicators of cardiovascular risk; a waist that measures less than half your height is generally considered lower risk

  • Blood pressure, fasting blood sugar, and cholesterol — these directly reflect how your cardiovascular and metabolic systems are functioning

  • Body composition via InBody or DXA scan — tracks actual fat mass, lean muscle mass, and visceral fat over time, independent of what the scale says

The markers that don't show up on any lab form — but matter just as much:

  • Your energy levels throughout the day

  • How your clothes fit and how you feel in your body

  • Your strength and endurance at the gym

  • Your sleep quality

  • Your digestion

  • Your confidence

These aren't soft or secondary outcomes. They are real, meaningful signals of how your body is doing. In practice, these are often the first things to shift when someone is genuinely moving toward better health — sometimes weeks or months before any lab value changes. People will come in saying, "I don't know if anything is working," and then describe sleeping through the night for the first time in years, carrying groceries without getting winded, and actually wanting to move their body. That is working. That counts.

You Don't Have to Figure This Out Alone

One of the most valuable parts of a health journey is having someone help you identify which metrics make sense for you, track them over time, and actually celebrate your wins — not just flag the numbers that are still out of range.

Hyper-focusing on BMI or the scale in isolation isn't just unhelpful — it can actively get in the way. It flattens a complex, dynamic picture of your health into a single data point and then asks you to feel good or bad about it. That's a lot of pressure to put on a number that, as we've established, wasn't designed to carry that weight. (Pun slightly intended.)

Ready to Get a Clearer Picture of Your Health?

If you're curious about what's actually going on in your body — beyond the number on the scale — an initial visit at Clarity Health Burlington includes access to an InBody body composition scan with full interpretation. You'll walk away knowing your actual muscle mass, fat mass, and visceral fat levels, and together we'll use that information to build a metabolic wellness plan that's specific to you and your goals.

You are not your BMI. You deserve a picture of your health that actually fits you.

Want an evidence-based approach to your body composition? Let's talk!

Book With Dr. Erin Today!

References

Caleyachetty R, Barber TM, Mohammed NI, et al. Ethnicity-specific BMI cutoffs for obesity based on type 2 diabetes risk in England: A population-based cohort study. The Lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2021;9(7):419–426. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00088-7

Cornier MA, Després JP, Davis N, et al. Assessing adiposity: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;124(18):1996–2019. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318233bc6a

Feng Q, Bešević J, Conroy M, et al. Waist-to-height ratio and body fat percentage as risk factors for ischemic cardiovascular disease: A prospective cohort study from UK Biobank. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2024;119(6):1386–1396. doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.03.018

Gibson S, Ashwell M. A simple cut-off for waist-to-height ratio (0.5) can act as an indicator for cardiometabolic risk: Recent data from adults in the Health Survey for England. The British Journal of Nutrition. 2020;123(6):681–690. doi:10.1017/S0007114519003301

Heymsfield SB, Sorkin JD, Thomas DM, et al. Weight/height²: Mathematical overview of the world's most widely used adiposity index. Obesity Reviews. 2025;26(1):e13842. doi:10.1111/obr.13842

Padwal RS, Pajewski NM, Allison DB, Sharma AM. Using the Edmonton Obesity Staging System to predict mortality in a population-representative cohort of people with overweight and obesity. CMAJ. 2011;183(14):E1059–66. doi:10.1503/cmaj.110387

Powell-Wiley TM, Poirier P, Burke LE, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(21):e984–e1010. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000973

Wu Y, Li D, Vermund SH. Advantages and limitations of the body mass index (BMI) to assess adult obesity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024;21(6):757. doi:10.3390/ijerph21060757

Share

Come hang on INSTAGRAM

Read the latest BLOG POST

Blog post
Blog post
Blog post
home
about
contact
work with me
contact
blog
learn with me
book with me

Don't Miss a Thing!

Join my monthly newsletter for guidance, my personal faves, and A's to your burning Q's!

© 2026 Dr. Erin Ley, ND All Rights Reserved ~ Privacy Policy | Terms | Disclaimer